Letter

CAM before the storm: authors' reply

BMJ 2005; 331 doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1205 (Published 17 November 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;331:1205.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Trevor D Thompson, clinical lecturer (trevor.thompson@bristol.ac.uk),
  2. Gene Feder, professor of primary care research and development
  1. Academic Department of Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL
  2. Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 4AT

    EDITOR—Predictably, our editorial on the integration of complementary therapies (CAM) into the NHS failed to satisfy the enthusiasts or sceptics.1

    We do not think that the debate about appropriate evaluative methodologies has been resolved. For example, the distinction between contextual and specific effects is problematic, …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular