- George R Aronoff, professor of medicine and pharmacology (George.Aronoff@kdp.louisville.edu)
- University of Louisville Kidney Disease Program, 615 South Preston Street, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
EDITOR—Vidal et al should be congratulated on the first scholarly, systematic review of secondary sources of prescribing information for patients with impaired renal function (p 263).1 That they found inconsistent and conflicting recommendations across multiple sources is not surprising. Their work underscores several problems with which we have struggled to compile our dosing recommendations in Drug Prescribing in Renal Failure.2
Primary sources
Early regulatory requirements did not include formal efficacy, safety, or pharmacokinetic studies for drugs in special populations, including patients with impaired kidney or liver function. Consequently, dosing recommendations for many older drugs are based on flimsy data, including sparse case reports, common usage, and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Does iron deficiency without anaemia cause fatigue and what is the reason behind it?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Histology of Pilar Cysts - a counsel of perfection?
Published 26 May 2012
Re: David Southall: anatomy of a wrecked career
Published 26 May 2012
Re: The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality
Published 26 May 2012
Re: Five years after baby Peter
Published 26 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27