This article has a correction
Please see: Why clinicians are natural bayesians: Authors' reply
- Roger N Chitty, consultant psychiatrist (joanne.harding@cwpnt.nhs.uk)
- Cherrybank Resource Centre, Ellesmere Port, Cheshire CH65 0BY
EDITOR—According to Gill et al, clinicians are natural bayesians.1 Their reasoning about patients is intuitive, probabilistic, and reiterative. Such subjective, context dependent reasoning is integral to clinical judgment and useful when diagnosing rare diseases.
In the same issue, the fictional Dr House is described.2 He, too, must be bayesian. He solves rare cases intuitively through flashes of grim …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012