Medical editors issue guidance on ghost writing

BMJ 2005; 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7498.988-a (Published 28 April 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:988.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Lynn Eaton
  1. London

    The World Association of Medical Editors has tightened its policy on ghost writing of medical research papers after a US journal highlighted what it alleges were illegitimate ghost writing practices, although it has been denied that the paper in question was an example of the practice.

    Ghost writing, says the association, is “unacceptable.” But it accepts that professional medical writers can be legitimate contributors to an article and says that their roles and affiliations should always be described in the manuscript.

    “Ghost writing initiated by industry is a big concern,” said Robert Fletcher, chairman of the association's editorial policy board and professor of ambulatory care and prevention at Harvard Medical School. “When it is undetected, it distorts the scientific record, substituting marketing and persuasion for the balanced exchange of views and the search for sound answers that characterise the contents of medical journals at their best.”

    Dr …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL