Presentation of benefits and harms needs to be balanced
- Peter C G⊘tzsche, director (pcg@cochrane.dk),
- Hazel Thornton, honorary visiting fellow,
- Karsten J J⊘rgensen, physician
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet Department, 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet Department, 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
EDITOR—Olsen et al found a 25% reduction in breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen compared with what they would expect to find in the absence of screening.1 They did an observational study, which is not considered to be a reliable method for evaluating mortality reductions with screening. …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012