Authors' reply to Aaby et al
- J Vaugelade, demographer (vaugelad@ird.fr),
- F Simondon, epidemiologist,
- E Elguero, statistician,
- S Pinchinat, biostatistician,
- G Guiella, researcher
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Laboratoire Population, Environnement et Développement, BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
- Biostatem, Parc Scientifique G Besse, F 30035 Nîmes, France
- Unité d'Etudes et de Recherche en Démographie, 03 BP 7118, Ouagadougou 03, Burkina Faso
EDITOR—Aaby et al raise issues of general rather than specific interest, as their references indicate. The study of the effects of vaccines, which pioneered the randomised controlled trials method more than 50 years ago, is still topical and of general interest.1 The limitations discussed by Aaby et al …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27