PERSONAL VIEW

Will the lead clinician please stand up?

BMJ 2005; 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7493.737 (Published 24 March 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:737.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Craig Gannon, consultant in palliative medicine (craiggannon@pah.org.uk)
  1. Esher, Surrey

    Medicine is not a pure science, and doctors are human. Although individual mistakes are inevitable and can even be enlightening, complacency remains unacceptable. Healthcare systems must minimise errors and should require an approach that is as evidence based as our approach to prescribing (and with an impact that is at least equivalent). In the case I describe here the “uncontroversial” progress in multidisciplinary working by the cancer team undermined, paradoxically, the traditional role of the lead clinician, allowing avoidable harm to the patient to occur without evoking concern.

    A fully independent elderly woman presented with lithium toxicity early last year. Depression was her only recent illness. She was discharged after her lithium dosage was reduced, without specific assessment or follow-up for mild renal impairment (her creatinine concentration was 180 μmol/l).

    She presented again two months later with a 5 cm lump in her breast. An outpatient …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL