GMC should not consider doctor's record when ruling on misconduct

BMJ 2005; 330 doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7492.616-b (Published 17 March 2005)
Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:616.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
  1. BMJ

    Testimonials from patients and colleagues, and a doctor's previously unblemished career, should not play a part when the General Medical Council decides whether the doctor is guilty of serious professional misconduct. This was a landmark ruling from the Court of Appeal last week.

    In the first acquittal of a doctor by the GMC to go to the appeal court, three judges ruled that evidence of a doctor's previous good record should be taken into account in mitigation when …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL