- Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
- BMJ
The General Medical Council, which regulates UK doctors, has “fundamental flaws” and its responsibility for disciplinary hearings that decide whether a doctor is fit to continue to practise should be handed over to an independent body, the Shipman inquiry concluded this week.
In a hard hitting report that she acknowledged would be “bruising” for the GMC, the inquiry's chairwoman, the appeal court judge Dame Janet Smith, said the council should no longer act as both investigator and judge under its new fitness to practise procedures. From November, these have replaced the old disciplinary regime under which panels decided whether doctors had been guilty of serious professional misconduct (BMJ 2004;329: 1366, 11 Dec, News Extra).
Dame Janet said it was inappropriate for the same body to carry out the investigative and judicial function and that she would have made the recommendation to hive …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012