PERSONAL VIEWS

Pitfalls on the road to drug safety

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1411 (Published 9 December 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:1411.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Carl Schoenberger (mcschoenberger@aol.com), pulmonologist
  1. Bethesda, Maryland

    The recent withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx) from the worldwide market has focused intense public scrutiny on drug safety. Although the US Food and Drug Administration monitors drug safety after product approval, some have raised concerns about whether this system, which relies primarily upon voluntary reporting of adverse drug effects, is adequate to protect the public from unsafe pharmaceuticals.

    In his televised appearance before the US Senate finance committee on 18 November, Dr David Graham, associate director in the FDA's Office of Drug Safety, claimed his own agency was “incapable of protecting [the public]” from other dangerous pharmaceuticals (BMJ 2004;329: 1253). He then listed five drugs that he considered potentially unsafe—the acne drug isotretinoin (Roaccutane), the weight loss drug sibutramine (sold as Reductil in Britain and Meridia in the United States), the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor valdecoxib (Bextra), the lipid lowering drug rosuvastatin (Crestor), and the asthma drug salmeterol (Serevent).

    I am all …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL