Bioterrorism and compulsory vaccination: Arguments for current vaccines are based on inadequate support for older vaccines

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7472.977-c (Published 21 October 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:977.4

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Walter R Schumm (Schumm@humec.ksu.edu), professor1
  1. 1 School of Family Studies and Human Services, Kansas State University, Justin Hall, 1700 Anderson Avenue, Manhattan, KS 66506-1403, USA

    EDITOR—Jefferson discussed some of the major flaws of the study by Brachman et al with respect to policies making certain vaccines compulsory in the US military.1 2 Additional shortcomings of the study by Brachman et al have been described in fuller detail elsewhere.35 For example, the often reported rate of 92.5% effectiveness for the anthrax vaccine sounds impressive but should be considered against the actual results in which 99.7% (378/379) of vaccinated workers avoided anthrax infection compared with 96.4% (399/414) of placebo workers. Thus the vaccine protected …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL