Reanalysis of alteplase for stroke stirs controversy

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7470.820-f (Published 7 October 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:820.7

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Jeanne Lenzer
  1. New York

    An independent panel, appointed by a leading US institute to reanalyse the data regarding stroke treatment, has published its findings which they say support the use of thrombolytic agent alteplase (tPA, also known as rt-PA) “to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke within three hours of onset under the NINDS [National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke] tPA trial protocol.”

    Data was reanalysed after an article in the BMJ (2002;324:723-9) sparked off controversy. The original study data reviewed by the panel was published in the New England Journal of Medicine more than nine years ago (1995;333:1581-7).

    Critics take issue, however, with the printed conclusions of the analysis published in this month's issue of Stroke (2004;35:2418-24).

    Jerome Hoffman, professor of medicine and emergency medicine at the University of California in Los Angeles and a leading critic of calls for widespread use of thrombolysis for stroke, …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL