Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Review may be eternal but rejection is swift

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.801-d (Published 30 September 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:801.5

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Jeremy N V Miles, lecturer in biostatistics (jnvm1@york.ac.uk)
  1. University of York, York YO10 5DD

    EDITOR—I hope that “eternal review” used in this editorial by Groves and Abbasi was a …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL