Letter
The evidence base for shaken baby syndrome: Response to Reece et al from 41 physicians and scientists
Cite this as:
BMJ
2004;329:741.4
- Patrick E Lantz, forensic pathologist (plantz@wfubmc.edu)
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
EDITOR—Reece et al have implied that child abuse is a particularly difficult area in which to conduct research.1 This difficulty does not justify circular reasoning, selection bias, imprecise case definition, unsystematic review publications, or conclusions that overstep the data.2–5 w1-w3
Geddes and Plunkett described the use of evidence based medicine in evaluating the causes of head injury in infants and …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012