Research bureaucracy in the United Kingdom: Research governance is about protection, not convenience

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7466.623-b (Published 9 September 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:623.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Justin T Denholm, hospital medical officer (neuromalacia@hotmail.com)
  1. Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3081, Australia

    EDITOR—Jones and Bamford express surprise and frustration that their study was temporarily halted after they introduced an interview to the existing protocol without research ethics committee approval.1 They seem not to have recognised that introducing a new aspect to their project may bring additional ethical considerations and problems for their existing research aims.

    They say that they did not …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL