- Jocalyn Clark
- BMJ
American policies on international health were condemned last week for being based on ideology rather than science; for rolling back progress achieved in protecting sexual and reproductive health and rights; for increasing the risk of unwanted pregnancies, HIV infection, and unsafe abortions; and for “condemning millions of women to die.”
Seven hundred participants from 109 countries gathered in London to review progress on the Cairo Consensus, a programme of action ratified by 179 nation states at the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD). The programme, which was designed to achieve sexual and reproductive rights for all by 2015, is now at the halfway point of its 20 year task. It is credited with introducing a human rights …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012