Letter

Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians: Clinics with peers keep you on the straight and narrow…

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7458.171 (Published 15 July 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:171.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Charles Essex (Room101@ntworld.com), consultant neurodevelopmental paediatrician
  1. Child Development Unit, Gulson Hospital, Coventry CV1 2HR

    EDITOR—Evans et al raise several points in their article reviewing methods of peer assessment.1

    Firstly, joint clinics are excellent for observing colleagues—and being observed by them—in genuine clinical situations. I regularly hold joint clinics with colleagues from overlapping specialties, such as genetics, neurology, ophthalmology, etc. I learn new ways of communicating …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular