Author's reply
- Tom Marshall, clinical lecturer (T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk)
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
EDITOR—Correspondents responding to my article on bmj.com raise several interesting issues.1 Nevertheless no correspondent disputes either the approach (incremental cost effectiveness analysis) or the fundamental findings: that aspirin and antihypertensive treatment with bendrofluazide and atenolol are markedly more cost effective than statins and clopidogrel.
Conradi et al and O'Donnell indicate that statins may have more side effects than is generally appreciated. Mann doubts the effectiveness of clopidogrel in primary prevention.1 Both points strengthen the paper's conclusions. I agree …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012