Author's reply
- Tom Marshall, clinical lecturer (T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk)
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
EDITOR—Correspondents responding to my article on bmj.com raise several interesting issues.1 Nevertheless no correspondent disputes either the approach (incremental cost effectiveness analysis) or the fundamental findings: that aspirin and antihypertensive treatment with bendrofluazide and atenolol are markedly more cost effective than statins and clopidogrel.
Conradi et al and O'Donnell indicate that statins may have more side effects than is generally appreciated. Mann doubts the effectiveness of clopidogrel in primary prevention.1 Both points strengthen the paper's conclusions. I agree …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27