Letter

Quality of randomised controlled trials

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7434.286-a (Published 29 January 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:286.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Quality of trial methods is not good in all disciplines

  1. Helen H G Handoll, senior lecturer (h.handoll@ed.ac.uk)
  1. School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA

    EDITOR—The paper by Soares et al is a useful reminder of the important distinction between quality of trial reporting and quality of trial methods.1

    An established, motivated, and informed group such as the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group is likely not only to have well designed trials but to conduct them according to …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular