Letter

Editors and their priorities about libel and fraud

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.230-b (Published 22 January 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:230.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Everyone in science must be active in its process

  1. John H Lange (johnhlange@worldnet.att.net), consultant
  1. Envirosafe Training and Consultants, PO Box 114022, Pittsburgh, PA 15239, USA

    EDITOR—Ferriman discusses whether editors have their priorities right, raising important issues, particularly for associate editors of specialist journals.1 For example, I cannot review papers for the issues raised by Ferriman because there is simply no time. Much of …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular