Authors' reply
- Peter Tyrer, head of department (p.tyrer@imperial.ac.uk),
- Edward Shorter, professor of the history of medicine
- 1Department of Psychological Medicine, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, St Mary's Campus, London W2 1PD
- 2History of Medicine Programme, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1VJ
EDITOR—Our article merely points to an inefficiency in drug development that seems to be driven by commercial imperatives, and as the targets are phoney diagnoses no advance is made. If we merely promote new indications for old drugs and dump existing compounds when they lose their patents is it surprising that depression and anxiety remain such major causes of morbidity?
Weeks is right to assert that …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012