- Jo Ann Rosenfeld (jrosenfe@jhmi.edu), assistant professor of medicine
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Brenda Maddox
Harper Collins, £20, pp 400 ISBN 0 00257149 8
Rating: 


Rosalind Franklin, the biophysicist whose work provided the scientific support for Watson and Crick's development of the structure of DNA, has remained a mystery, her opinions and motivations hidden. Was she—as described by her colleague Maurice Wilkins, who shared the Nobel prize with Watson and Crick—the “dark lady,” a bellicose spinster who could not collaborate and resented their work and originality? Was her work ignored because it was insignificant or because she was antisocial? Or was she a brilliant scientist and feminist, a sacrificial victim, her work overlooked and her progress diminished because she was an outsider who didn't fit into the “old boy” network? The truth, of course, lies …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Should UK membership exams be held overseas? Yes
Published 9 February 2012
Why not use ultrasound for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer for both the exclusion criteria for recruitment and for diagnosis as outcome variable
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Can the severity of menopausal symptoms be predicted?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Does the BMJ have a particular ideology to pursue in assisted dying?
Published 9 February 2012
Re: Efficacy and safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 9 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Wakefield sues BMJ over MMR articles (5 responses)
Published 10 Jan 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012