Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Human cost should not be dismissed

  1. Simon Curtis (simon.curtis@gp-K84011.nhs.uk), general practitioner
  1. Summertown Health Centre, Oxford OX2 7BS
  2. York District Hospital, York YO31 8HE

    EDITOR—Greenhalgh and Powell's editorial assesses the economic evaluation of the multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS), but it masks with numbers a human tragedy at the core of the story: this is a screening study that killed people. 1 2

    The authors mention in passing a mortality of 6% among the 322 men who had surgery as a result of the invitation to screening. This figure represents 19 men, comparatively young at retirement age, who before receiving the invitation would have been living their lives unfettered by the knowledge that they had an aneurysm. Now they are dead.

    Obviously some of these men might have died anyway from a sudden …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular