- Rosemarie McCabe, senior research fellow (r.mccabe{at}qmul.ac.uk)a,
- Christian Heath, professor of work and organisationsb,
- Tom Burns, professor of community psychiatryc,
- Stefan Priebe, professora
- aUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London E13 8SP
- bManagement Centre, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, London SE1 8WA
- cDepartment of Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
- Interactive Skills Unit, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
- Correspondence to: R McCabe
- Accepted 1 August 2002
Abstract
Objective: To investigate how doctors engage with patients with psychotic illness in routine consultations.
Design: Conversation analysis of 32 consultations between psychiatrists and patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
Setting: Two psychiatric outpatient clinics in east London and south west London.
Participants: 7 psychiatrists and 32 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
Main outcome measure: Mutual engagement in communication during the consultation.
Results: Patients actively attempted to talk about the content of their psychotic symptoms in consultations by asking direct questions, repeating their questions and utterances, and producing these utterances in the concluding part of the consultation. In response, doctors hesitated, responded with a question rather than with an answer, and smiled or laughed (when informal carers were present), indicating that they were reluctant to engage with patients' concerns about their psychotic symptoms.
Conclusions: Patients repeatedly attempted to talk about the content of their psychotic symptoms, which was a source of noticeable interactional tension and difficulty. Addressing patients' concerns about their illness may lead to a more satisfactory outcome of the consultation and improve engagement of such patients in the health services.
Footnotes
-
Funding None.
-
Competing interests None.
- Accepted 1 August 2002
Commentary: Understanding conversation
- John Skelton, director. (j.r.skelton{at}bham.ac.uk)
- aUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London E13 8SP
- bManagement Centre, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, London SE1 8WA
- cDepartment of Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE
- Interactive Skills Unit, Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
Footnotes
-
Transcripts and the transcript conventions appear on bmj.com

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Why the US healthcare system is failing, and what might rescue it
Published 16 May 2012
Re: Risk of cardiovascular serious adverse events associated with varenicline use for tobacco cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published 16 May 2012
Most responses
Is spending on proton beam therapy for cancer going too far, too fast? (11 responses)
Published 17 Apr 2012 - 23:32
What are the benefits of an early diagnosis? (8 responses)
Published 18 Apr 2012
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21