Primary care

Patients' decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: qualitative study

BMJ 2002; 325 doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7369.873 (Published 19 October 2002)
Cite this as: BMJ 2002;325:873.1
  1. John Benson, university lecturer in general practice (jab62{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk)a,
  2. Nicky Britten, director, GKT concordance unitb
  1. aGeneral Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR
  2. bDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's Hospital, London SE11 6SP
  1. Correspondence to: J Benson
  • Accepted 22 May 2002

Abstract

Objective: To describe the ways in which patients taking antihypertensive drugs balance reservations against reasons for taking them.

Design: Qualitative study using detailed interviews.

Setting: Two urban general practices in the United Kingdom.

Participants: Maximum variety sample of 38 interviewees receiving repeat perscriptions for antihypertensives.

Main outcome measures: Interviewees' reservations about drugs and reasons for taking antihypertensives.

Results: Patients had reservations about drugs generally and reservations about antihypertensives specifically. Reasons for taking antihypertensive drugs comprised positive experiences with doctors, perceived benefits of medication, and pragmatic considerations. Patients weighed their reservations against reasons for taking antihypertensives in a way that made sense for them personally. Some individual patients weighed different reservations against different reasons for taking antihypertensives.

Conclusions: Patients' ideas may derive from considerations unrelated to the drugs' pharmacology. Doctors who want their patients to make well informed choices about antihypertensives and to reach concordant decisions about prescribing should explore how individuals strike this balance, to personalise discussion of drug use.

Footnotes

  • Funding Health Services research fellowship from the anglia and Oxford Health Authority and honorary research fellowship for JB in Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's Department of General Practice and Primary Care. Research expenses through a grant from the Scientific Foundation Board of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

  • Competing interests None declared

Rapid responses

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls

BMJ most popular