- Andrew F Smith, consultant anaesthetist (Andrew.Smith@l.bay-tr.nwest.nhs.uk)
- Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster LA1 4RP
EDITOR—Edwards et al neatly summarised the state of current knowledge on communicating risk.1 I have three further points to add.
Firstly, readers may be interested in the risk ladder we developed to display the risks associated with anaesthesia in comparison with some everyday risks (figure). 2 3
Risk ladders for everyday and clinical risks. Reproduced with permission of Blackwell Scientific
Secondly, I think that the authors either have chosen not to address or been unaware that communication about risk and safety takes place throughout a consultation and not simply when the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27