- Roger Dobson
- Abergavenny
Only one in 50 health websites on infertility meets basic standards for quality and accountability.
Researchers who sampled websites using five different search engines found only four that met a set of four recognised standards. The researchers say that clinicians need to either run their own websites or act as internet gatekeepers for their patients, identifying accurate and worthwhile sites.
“Results suggest that most web sites and pages fail to post even the most minimal information that would assist the online infertile patient to make decisions about the reliability and utility of the content offered. This outcome is problematic not only for people seeking infertility information but also for clinicians,” says a report of the research (Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health 2002;47:264-8).
For the research the team, from Boston University's School of Public Health, …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012