- Alex Vass, editorial registrar,
- Claire McKenna, second year medical student
- BMJ
- Queen's University, Belfast, and BMJ Clegg scholar
As the main means of communication between medical journals and the media, press releases have a pivotal role in conveying scientific accuracy. But can they do that at the same time as making the results attractive to lay journalists?
A study in last week's Journal of the American Medical Association (2002;287:2856-8) found that press releases from medical journals often present data using formats that exaggerate the importance of the findings and do not routinely highlight study limitations or conflicts of interest.
The study authors, Steven Woloshin and Lisa …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012