Encouraging pregnant women to eat fish did not show effect
- Michel Odent (modent@aol.com), director,
- Suzanne Colson, research midwife,
- Paul De Reu, research midwife
- Primal Health Research Centre, London NW3 2JR
- Healthnet of Cuba, Missouri, 6744 Clayton Road, St Louis, MO 6311, USA
EDITOR—Should we routinely encourage all pregnant women to consume sea fish or to increase their consumption of sea fish? This is the main practical question inspired by the study by Olsen and Secher.1
In 1991-2, in the antenatal clinic of Whipps Cross Hospital in east London, we randomly encouraged 499 pregnant women (before 20 weeks) to increase their consumption of sea fish. Each woman was matched with a control who had had the same number of births. We could not detect any …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27