- Jonathan R Benger, specialist registrar in emergency medicine (JB{at}sectae.org.uk)a,
- Alison V Pearce, specialist registrar in paediatricsb
- a Emergency Department, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol BS16 1LE
- b Department of Community Child Health, Frenchay Hospital, Frenchay, Bristol BS16 1LE
- Correspondence to: J Benger, Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8BW
- Accepted 22 November 2001
Abstract
Problem: Child abuse is easily overlooked in a busy emergency department.
Design: Two stage audit of 1000 children before and after introduction of reminder flowchart.
Background and setting: An emergency department in a suburban teaching hospital seeing about 4000 injured preschool children a year.
Key measures for improvement: Number of records in which intentional injury was adequately documented and considered and the number of children referred for further assessment before and after introduction of reminder flowchart into emergency department notes.
Strategies for change: Nurses were asked to insert a reminder flowchart for assessing intentional injury into the notes of all children aged 0-5 years attending the department with any injury and to record the results of checking the child protection register.
Effect of change: Documentation of all eight indicators that intentional injury had been considered had increased in the second audit. Records of compatibility of history with injury and consistency of history increased from less than 2% to more than 70% (P<0.0001). More children were referred for further assessment in the second audit than the first, although the difference was not significant (6 (0.6%) v14 (1.4%), P=0.072). The general level of awareness and vigilance increased in the second audit, even for children whose records did not contain the flowchart.
Lessons learnt: Inclusion of a simple reminder flowchart in the notes of injured preschool children attending the emergency department increases awareness, consideration, and documentation of intentional injury. Rates of referral for further assessment also increase.
Footnotes
-
Funding None.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Details of the children included in the study appear on bmj.com
- Accepted 22 November 2001
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012