- Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
- BMJ
An English health authority that has not contacted former patients of an HIV positive dentist nearly a year after it learned of his HIV status won an appeal court ruling last week barring the media from identifying it.
No decision has yet been taken on whether to get in touch with patients of the dentist, who has now developed AIDS and offer them HIV testing. Official guidelines under which patients of HIV positive health workers who perform invasive procedures are contacted and offered counselling and testing are about to be superseded by new guidance, but not until mid-March at the earliest.
Three appeal court judges, headed by the master of the rolls, Lord Phillips, set aside a ban on identifying the man's specialty but overturned a High Court ruling allowing the Mail on …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012