- Mark F Blaxill, father of autistic child (Blaxill.Mark@BCG.com)
- 22 Fayerweather Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
EDITOR—Because of the current concern over the rising incidence of autism the BMJ owes its readers better information than a letter based on comments by a focus group of interested parties.1 Would the journal have published a letter from a focus group of parents who believed that MMR vaccine (measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine) had caused their child's autism? I doubt it.
Rigorous methods are especially important because of a controversial current hypothesis.2 Fombonne has argued that despite reported …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012