Perhaps we should seek consent to show necropsies to students
- Julian L Burton (j.l.burton@shef.ac.uk), clinical lecturer in histopathology
- Academic Unit of Pathology, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX
- Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW
EDITOR—Sayers and Mair highlight the reasons for which hospital (consent) necropsies are performed and for which clinicians are now faced with the task of seeking informed consent—to confirm the cause of death, to answer diagnostic queries, and to obtain and retain material for research and teaching.1 Another key use of a necropsy, not mentioned on the consent form, is in undergraduate teaching. Many medical students will encounter the necropsy during their training, either witnessing the whole procedure or as a demonstration of the pathological findings of the procedure in which organs and tissues are displayed (perhaps with the patient's body in the background) before their return to the body.
Should explicit informed consent be obtained to use necropsy in this way? The short report by Westberg et al in the same issue serves to highlight the importance of obtaining consent for students to witness invasive procedures such as a vaginal examination, even though most patients do not object.2 Necropsy is no less invasive. Whether patients and relatives would object to a group of students viewing the body after death is not known. It is established, however, that “an important precondition for good education of medical students is that patients are prepared to participate in training.” …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012