Perhaps we should seek consent to show necropsies to students
- Julian L Burton (j.l.burton@shef.ac.uk), clinical lecturer in histopathology
- Academic Unit of Pathology, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX
- Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW
EDITOR—Sayers and Mair highlight the reasons for which hospital (consent) necropsies are performed and for which clinicians are now faced with the task of seeking informed consent—to confirm the cause of death, to answer diagnostic queries, and to obtain and retain material for research and teaching.1 Another key use of a necropsy, not mentioned on the consent form, is in undergraduate teaching. Many medical students will encounter the necropsy during their training, either witnessing the whole procedure or as a demonstration of the pathological findings of the procedure in which organs and tissues are displayed (perhaps with the patient's body in the background) before their return to the body.
Should explicit informed consent be obtained to use necropsy in this way? The short report by Westberg et al in the same issue serves to highlight the importance of obtaining consent for students to witness invasive procedures such as a vaginal examination, even though most patients do not object.2 Necropsy is no less invasive. Whether patients and relatives would object to a group of students viewing the body after death is not known. It is established, however, that “an important precondition for good education of medical students is that patients are prepared to participate in training.” …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27