- Charlene Harrington, professor (chas@itsa.ucsf.edu)
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California at San Francisco, 3333 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA
This is the second in a series of three articles
Poor quality care has been an enduring feature of many of the 16 500 residential nursing facilities that provide care to 1.6 million people in the United States.1 Despite three decades of public concern, government surveys and data collected by the federal government continue to show that residents of nursing homes experience problems in their care (figure). In 1998 and 1999, 25-33% of nursing homes had serious or potentially life threatening problems in delivering care and were harming residents. 3 4 In 1999, state inspectors found that 26% of the nation's nursing facilities had poor food hygiene; 21% provided care that was inadequate; 19% had environments that contributed to injuries in residents; and in 18% pressure sores were treated improperly. The eight most common deficiencies identified in 1999 are shown in the box.2 About 77% of facilities that were performing poorly had problems in subsequent surveys conducted by state licensing and certification agencies.2
Violations of care standards in nursing homes in the United States, 1991-92
Summary points
Poor quality care for the 1.6 million people in nursing homes in the United States has existed for 25 years
Care in as many as one third of nursing homes jeopardises the health and safety of residents
The largely profit making nursing home industry provides fewer nurses and poorer quality of care than non-profit homes and government run nursing homes
A fundamental cause of poor care is the low number of nurses and other staff required by law
Monitoring and enforcement of quality standards, which has been devolved to the states, has been weak because standards are lax
The US government has failed to hold the nursing home industry accountable for how government funds are spent and to protect residents from …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012