Biological age is more important than chronological age
- Nicholas Beare, specialist registrar in ophthalmology (nbeare@btinternet.com)
- Eye Department, Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral L49 5PE
- International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eye Care, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500 034, India
EDITOR—Wong's article on the effectiveness of cataract surgery in elderly people contains an emphasis on chronological age and final visual acuity as a measure of success.1 Wong does not mention the importance of biological age of individual patients and pays little attention to the potential improvement in daily functioning associated with cataract surgery. These are important factors when considering patients of any age for cataract surgery. But they are difficult to measure quantitatively and difficult to investigate; consequently they are not easily shoehorned into guidelines or health policy. A visual acuity of 6/12 or better is generally taken as a successful outcome in most studies in this area, and Wong applies this assumption …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012