Statistics Notes

Concealing treatment allocation in randomised trials

BMJ 2001; 323 doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7310.446 (Published 25 August 2001)
Cite this as: BMJ 2001;323:446.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Douglas G Altman, professor of statistics in medicinea,
  2. Kenneth F Schulz, vice president, Quantitative Sciencesb
  1. a ICRF Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF,
  2. b Family Health International, PO Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
  1. Correspondence to: D G Altman

    We have previously explained why random allocation of treatments is a required design feature of controlled trials1 and explained how to generate a random allocation sequence.2 Here we consider the importance of concealing the treatment allocation until the patient is entered into the trial.

    Regardless of how the allocation sequence has been generated — such as by simple or stratified randomisation2 — there will be a prespecified sequence of treatment allocations. In principle, therefore, it is possible to know what treatment the next patient will get at the time when a decision is taken to consider the patient for entry into the trial.

    The strength of the randomised trial is based on aspects of design which eliminate various types of bias. Randomisation of patients to treatment groups eliminates bias by making the characteristics of the patients in two (or more) groups the same on average, and stratification with blocking may help to reduce chance imbalance in a particular trial.2 All this good work can be undone if a poor procedure is adopted to …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL