National framework could transform care for older people in England
- Ian Philp (ian.philp@doh.gsi.gov.uk), co-chair of executive reference group for national service framework
- Department of Health, London SE1 8UG
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
- Murray Royal Hospital, Perth PH2 7BH
- Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth BH7 7DW
- Freeman Hospital Stroke Service, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN
- Greenridge Surgery, Birmingham B13 0PT
- University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
- University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU
EDITOR—Grimley Evans and Tallis criticise the national service framework for older people.1 I agree with them that the policy to reduce emergency admissions to hospital only among the over 75s is ageist. Application of the framework's age discrimination standard means that this high level performance measure will have to be changed to an age standardised measure.
The framework model for intermediate care services requires there to be comprehensive assessment, active rehabilitation, and medical leadership involving both hospital specialists and general practitioners. There will be no return to 1960s-style convalescence and other forms of marginalising older people.
On research strategy, the national framework supports the recommendations of the research and development strategic review to establish a national research advisory network for older people and for a directed programme of research; this has already commissioned a £1.2m programme to evaluate intermediate care.
On information provision, the framework will ensure scrutiny by patients and the public of all age based policies. It will also ensure the involvement of older people in patient forums, the local strategic partnerships, and the development of personal care plans that reflect individual needs, circumstances, and priorities.
The single assessment process will not replace medical diagnoses and decision making but will ensure that a single patient record is built up over time and shared among healthcare and social-care professionals, to replace the current inefficient and fragmented records systems.
Milestones for implementation of the falls standard are longer than those for some other parts of the framework as evidence is emerging about how best to organise this key component of services. Achieving organised services for the prevention and management of falls will be a great advance in the care of older people.
An inclusive approach was used throughout the development of the national service framework. The success of the …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012