Paper does not provide any reassurance
- Nick Dunn (nick.dunn@soton.ac.uk), senior lecturer in primary medical care
- Southampton University, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST
- Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton SO31 1AA
EDITOR—Shakir et al investigated the possibility of myocardial infarction being an adverse drug reaction among users of sildenafil.1 However, their paper suffers from the problem that users of the drug are not representative of the general male population.
The authors point out that the proportion of men with diabetes among the users of sildenafil was four to five times higher than the national average. The overall mortality from acute myocardial infarction is four times higher among diabetic than non-diabetic men.2 Thus standardisation by the general male population of England is not appropriate and will give an underestimate of the expected number of deaths in this cohort. The standardised mortality ratio should be even less than the 69.9% quoted. Are we to believe …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012