- Deborah Josefson
- San Francisco
The US Supreme Court has ruled unanimously against the medical use of marijuana, finding, by eight to nil, that because it is an illegal substance in federal law, no exceptions can be made, even for its medicinal use.
The court rejected the arguments brought by the Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, which argued for compassionate exceptions in medical cases.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that “the Federal Controlled Substances Act, while authorising the medical use of some drugs that generally cannot be bought and sold, makes no exception whatever for marijuana.”
He added that marijuana had no currently accepted medical use according to the Controlled Substances Act.
The Supreme Court's decision deals a serious blow to the medical marijuana movement and pits federal against state laws. It comes at a time when marijuana is gaining broad acceptance as a medicinal substance.
The drive to legalise marijuana for medicinal purposes …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27