Letter

Costs and effectiveness of community postnatal support workers

BMJ 2001; 322 doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.301 (Published 3 February 2001)
Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:301.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Researchers must now focus on effectiveness with specific groups of women

  1. Jane Barlow, primary care career scientist (jane.barlow@dphpc.ox.ac.uk),
  2. Sarah Stewart-Brown, director
  1. Health Services Research Unit, University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, Headington, Oxfordshire OX3 7LF
  2. Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA
  3. Mother and Infant Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LN

    EDITOR—Evaluation of the effectiveness of home visiting programmes in the United Kingdom, as in Morrell et al's study, is much needed.1 Several systematic reviews of the effectiveness of these programmes have indicated that their success depends on the population selected, the extent to which the skills of the staff have been matched to the needs of the family, and the duration of the programme.2 The disappointing results of Morrell et al's trial might well be understood in terms of the first two of these factors in particular.

    Perhaps most importantly, there is evidence of differential effects of home visiting programmes in subgroups of individuals. Several studies have shown that support of this nature that is offered to mothers who are already coping, or to mothers who are not experiencing adversity, can not only fail to produce positive outcomes but also lead to …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular