Education and debate
Ethical debate
Doctoring malaria, badly: the global campaign to ban DDTDDT for malaria control should not be bannedCommentary: Reduction and elimination of DDT should proceed slowly
Cite this as:
BMJ
2000;321:1403.1
- BMJ Series
- Breast cancer
- Childhood nutrition
- Drugs: musculoskeletal and joint diseases
- Environmental issues
- Epidemiologic studies
- Epidemiology
- Ethical debates
- Infant nutrition (including breastfeeding)
- Infectious diseases
- Nutrition and metabolism
- Obstetrics and gynaecology
- Oncology
- Paediatric oncology
- Paediatrics
- Public health
- Reproductive medicine
- Rheumatology
- Sociology
- Special collections
More topics 
Fewer topics
This article has a correction
Please see: Doctoring malaria, badly: the global campaign to ban DDT
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Severe human rights abuses in healthcare settings
Published 21 May 2012
Re: Lack of specialist diabetes teams in hospitals is “absolutely disgraceful,” says NHS clinical lead
Published 21 May 2012
Re: Taxing unhealthy food and drinks to improve health
Published 21 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 21 May 2012
Re: Editorial ignored 17 reviews on wind turbines and health
Published 21 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (6 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32