Letter

Effect of on-site mental health professionals

BMJ 2000; 321 doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.701/a (Published 16 September 2000)
Cite this as: BMJ 2000;321:701.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Longer trials are needed

  1. Mark Ashworth, research fellow
  1. Guy's, King's and St Thomas's Department of General Practice, Kings College London, London SE11 6SP
  2. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL

    EDITOR—The systematic review by Bower and Sibbald of on-site mental health professionals was a welcome addition to the literature on the effectiveness of the talking therapies in primary care.1 In view of the effect on consultation rates, prescribing of psychotropic drugs, and referrals to secondary care, the conclusion drawn was that the evidence for a direct effect was strongest in relation to general practitioner referrals to secondary care providers.

    Six randomised controlled trials of direct effects on referrals were identified. Three were reported as showing referrals to be significantly reduced. Although some of the limitations of the studies were discussed, each of the six trials is flawed in terms of being able to generalise to everyday primary care

    One trial was described as showing a significant reduction in referrals when the stated P value was 0.56, which is not significant.2 Furthermore, the therapy offered was from a psychiatrist based in primary care …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular