Letter

Health professionals do not understand mathematical models

BMJ 2000; 320 doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7234.581/a (Published 26 February 2000)
Cite this as: BMJ 2000;320:581.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. W J Edmunds, health economist (jedmunds@phls.nhs.uk),
  2. N J Gay, mathematical modeller
  1. PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5EQ

    EDITOR—The science commentary on herd immunity that accompanied the article by Panagiotopoulos et al on an increase in the occurrence of congenital rubella after immunisation seemed irrelevant.1 In this letter we attempt to explain the relevant issues.

    Immunising a proportion of the population reduces the risk of infection (not necessarily disease) among those who are not immunised. This indirect protection from infection is termed herd immunity. It can be manifested in two different ways.

    Firstly, if the level of vaccine coverage is high …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular