Research questions for systematic reviews must be unambiguous from protocol stage

BMJ 1999; 319 doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1265a (Published 6 November 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;319:1265.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Gunther Eysenbach, researcher (ey@yi.com)
  1. University of Heidelberg, Department of Clinical Social Medicine, Unit for Cybermedicine, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany

    EDITOR—The systematic review of Walton et al aimed to “identify all comparative studies in which computers were used to help determine the most appropriate drug dose,”1 including studies in which participants are “patients receiving drug therapy based on advice from a computer.”2 According to this protocol, the authors clearly should have included studies in which advice is given direct to patients, nurses, or intermediates, such as in software applications for diabetes management.3 Such studies, however, were …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL