- Catherine Zollman,
- Andrew Vickers
The past 10 years has seen a significant increase in the amount of complementary medicine being accessed through the NHS. These services are not evenly distributed, and many different delivery mechanisms are used, some of which (such as homoeopathic hospitals) predate the inception of the NHS. Others depend on more recent NHS reorganisations, like general practice fundholding and health commission contracting, or have been set up as evaluated pilot projects.
Complementary therapies have been available in the NHS since its inception
Integrating complementary medicine into conventional settings
Successful integration is more likely with
Demand from patients
Commitment from high level staff in the conventional organisation
Protected time for education and communication
Ongoing evaluation of service (may help to defend service in the face of financial threat)
Links with other conventional establishments integrating complementary medicine
Realism and good will from all parties
Jointly agreed guidelines or protocols between complementary and conventional practitioners
Support from senior management or health authority
Careful selection and supervision of complementary practitioners
Funding from charitable or voluntary sector
Problems are likely with
Financial insecurity
Time pressure
Lack of appropriate premises
Unrealistic expectations
Overwhelming demand
Inappropriate referrals
Unresolved differences in perspective between complementary and conventional practitioners
Real or perceived lack of evidence of effectiveness
Lack of resources and time for reflection and evaluation
List adapted from the report of the Delivery Mechanisms Working Party of the Foundation for Integrated Medicine
In general, development of these services has been demand led rather than evidence led. A few have published formal evaluations or audit reports. Some of these show benefits associated with complementary therapy—high patient satisfaction, significant improvements on validated health questionnaires compared with waiting list controls, and suggestions of reduced prescribing and referrals. However, data from other services are less clear, and many have not been formally evaluated These pilot projects have also identified various factors that influence the integration of complementary medicine practitioners within …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012