- John Macleod, Clinical research fellow,
- George Davey Smith, Professor of clinical epidemiology
- Department of General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
- Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR
EDITOR—A report by the expert advisory group to the chief medical officer suggested that a screening programme in the United Kingdom for Chlamydia trachomatis should be based around the opportunistic testing of women attending primary care and the tracing of their contacts.1 Duncan and Hart discuss some of the possible negative consequences of this decision.2 There are some further reasons why the Department of Health's stated strategy is a bad idea.
Chlamydia screening has …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012