- David R Sandeman, consultant neurosurgeon
- Bristol
Another meeting on clinical governance and yet again it is surgeons who are cast as the main villains by purchasers, managers, and even fellow clinicians. Since surgery is the only discipline where it is easy to measure outcome all discussion on this topic seems to revert to surgery. I ought to be used to the charge of being an élitist megalomaniac. After all I am a neurosurgeon, and everyone knows that the only difference between God and a neurosurgeon is that God does not want to be a neurosurgeon. However, I do not think that I fit this caricature. What is it that really motivates me and my colleagues?
For me, surgery has always been a vocation. I have been able to accept the responsibility of operating only by setting myself the highest standards. Of course, resources are limited, but I used to be proud to be part of a system that allowed for ideals other than personal financial gain. To be a …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012