Letter

Full information about trials might be given retrospectively to participants

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7185.736a (Published 13 March 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:736.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Sarah Clement, Lecturer in health services research (s.clement@umds.ac.uk)
  1. Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London SE1 7EH

    EDITOR—One of the central issues in the debate about informed consent in randomised controlled trials1 has been the ethics of withholding the fact of randomisation from participants—for example, in the trials of support after stroke2 and of management of sore throat.3 Psychologists recognise that it is sometimes necessary to withhold full information from participants, to minimise bias. Our professional code of conduct (http://www.bps.org.uk/charter/codofcon.htm) states that in these situations we must “provide … full information …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    BMJ most popular