Rescue thrombolysis for failure of primary thrombolysis cannot be justified

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.261 (Published 23 January 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:261.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. A G C Sutton, Research fellow (asutton@claranet.co.uk)
  1. Department of Cardiology, South Cleveland Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW

    EDITOR—Drenth et al suggest a policy of repeat thrombolysis if initial thrombolysis fails,1 but their arguments are flawed.

    Firstly, they state that a routine policy of rescue angioplasty cannot be justified from a review of the literature, although they fail to mention that the trial by Ellis et al showed a significant reduction in the incidence of death or severe heart failure in the rescue angioplasty group compared with the conservative group.2 …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL