Letter

Meta-analyses of observational data should be done with due care

BMJ 1999; 318 doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7175.56 (Published 2 January 1999)
Cite this as: BMJ 1999;318:56.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. George Davey Smith, Professor of clinical epidemiology,
  2. Matthias Egger, Senior lecturer in epidemiology
  1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR

    EDITOR—In our review of meta-analyses of observational studies we pointed out that all these are susceptible to all the biases inherent in observational research1 and that it is easy to generate seemingly plausible explanations for findings of observational studies that are in fact spurious.2Birkett's critique of one of our examples illustrates these points.3

    Relation between dietary calcium and systolic blood pressure by method of dietary assessment. Erroneous data published by Cappuccio et al4 (panel A) and corrected analyses by Birkett3 (panel B). Slopes with 95% …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular